As electronic assemblies pushed to higher circuit density, array packages arrived achieving higher circuit density compared to perimeter leaded packages such as the QFP. One concern at that time (>10 years ago) was that the BGA solder joints were not visually inspectable. This concern however was overcome by the promise of much higher yields for array packages. At that time, fine-pitch QFPs did suffer from solder assembly yields from solder bridging and other process problems. Consortiums were formed, papers were written and degrees were given. The conclusion was that with ordinary process optimization, the yields would be so high that the array packages would produce more consistent, high yield solder joints.
As of this writing in 2010, based on a reading of industry publications (ref 1, 2, 3),. BGA solder issues are quite common and the lack of visual inspection is a great hindrance to diagnoses. In fact, there is now an instrument (ERSAscope) which was developed specifically to address BGA solder problems. Meanwhile the fine-pitch QFPs show very high yields thanks to improvements in solder paste and processes. Although one might think this is just a yield issue, the difficulty in test and inspection raises reliability concerns.
When RoHS was introduced, pad cratering surprised the industry as the higher temperature PCB laminates became more brittle and therefore prone to cratering. Recently, Head-and-Pillow seems to be a particular problem judging from references 1, 2 and 3 below. This is partly due to increase warpage of components at higher reflow temperatures although it could happen at lower tin/lead processing temperatures as well. Warpage of BGAs as not been focused on as much in the industry including by component suppliers. There are also other BGA solder issues that are beginning to appear. As the BGA/CSP packages become finer in pitch (0.8 mil and below) and the pad areas get smaller, any contamination or marginal solderability on the substrate becomes a problem. Other packages such as SOICs and QFPs use a larger pad area and are not as sensitive to these conditions. The prediction from this blog is that more BGA soldering studies will be performed, more papers will be written, more tutorials will be given.
References
1. Head-and-Pillow SMT Failure Modes, Intel, SMTA International
2. Telecommunications Case Studies Address Head-in-Pillow Defects and Mitigation through Assembly Process Modifications and Control, Acatel-Lucent, AEPX 2010
3. Awakening from Head-and-Pillow: A Novel Pre-Production Test Method for BGA non-wet Issues, Senju Metal, SMTA International
